feat(github-copilot-sdk): release v0.10.0 with native prompt restoration and live todo widget

- Restore native Copilot CLI prompts for authentic Plan Mode behavior
- Add SQLite-backed session management for state persistence via system prompt
- Implement Adaptive Autonomy (Agent chooses planning vs direct execution)
- Fix OpenWebUI custom tool context injection for v0.8.x compatibility
- Add compact Live TODO widget synchronized with session.db
- Upgrade SDK to github-copilot-sdk==0.1.30
- Remove legacy mode switch RPC calls (moved to prompt-driven orchestration)
- Fix intent status localization and widget whitespace optimization
- Sync bilingual READMEs and all documentation mirrors to v0.10.0
This commit is contained in:
fujie
2026-03-07 04:30:15 +08:00
parent 35dec491de
commit f5a983fb4a
44 changed files with 5993 additions and 489 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
---
description: "Release preflight review for version sync, bilingual docs, release notes, and release-facing consistency"
private: true
labels: [automation, review, release, gh-aw]
metadata:
author: Fu-Jie
category: maintenance
maturity: draft
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, reopened, synchronize, ready_for_review]
paths:
- 'plugins/**/*.py'
- 'plugins/**/README.md'
- 'plugins/**/README_CN.md'
- 'plugins/**/v*.md'
- 'plugins/**/v*_CN.md'
- 'docs/plugins/**/*.md'
- 'README.md'
- 'README_CN.md'
- '.github/**'
forks: ["*"]
workflow_dispatch:
roles: all
skip-bots: [github-actions, copilot, dependabot, renovate]
permissions:
contents: read
issues: read
pull-requests: read
engine: copilot
network:
allowed:
- defaults
safe-outputs:
add-comment:
target: triggering
max: 1
hide-older-comments: true
footer: false
allowed-github-references: [repo]
timeout-minutes: 12
tools:
github:
toolsets: [repos, issues, pull_requests]
bash:
- pwd
- ls
- cat
- head
- tail
- grep
- wc
- rg
- git status
- git diff
- git show
- git ls-files
---
# Release Preflight Review
You are the repository maintainer assistant for `Fu-Jie/openwebui-extensions`.
Your job is to perform a **release-preflight review** for the triggering change and leave **one concise summary comment only when there is actionable release-facing feedback**.
If the change is not actually release-prep, or it already looks consistent enough that there is no useful maintainer feedback to add, you **must call `noop`** with a short explanation.
## Primary Goal
Review the change for:
- version-sync completeness
- bilingual README and docs consistency
- release-notes completeness
- release-facing index or badge drift
- missing migration or maintainer context for a user-visible release
This workflow is **review-only**. Do not modify files, push code, create releases, or open pull requests.
## High-Priority Source Files
Use these files as the authoritative rule set before forming conclusions:
- `.github/copilot-instructions.md`
- `.github/instructions/commit-message.instructions.md`
- `.github/skills/release-prep/SKILL.md`
- `.github/skills/doc-mirror-sync/SKILL.md`
- `.github/workflows/release.yml`
- `docs/development/gh-aw-integration-plan.md`
- `docs/development/gh-aw-integration-plan.zh.md`
## Review Scope
Start from the PR diff and changed files only. Expand into related release-facing files only when needed to verify sync.
Prioritize repository release policy over generic release advice. This workflow should act like a maintainer performing a final consistency pass before a release-oriented merge.
Focus especially on these areas:
### 1. Version Sync Across Release Files
When a plugin release is being prepared, check whether the expected version bump is consistently reflected across the release-facing file set:
- plugin Python docstring `version:`
- plugin-local `README.md`
- plugin-local `README_CN.md`
- docs mirror page in `docs/plugins/**`
- Chinese docs mirror page in `docs/plugins/**/*.zh.md`
- plugin list entries or badges in `docs/plugins/{type}/index.md`
- plugin list entries or badges in `docs/plugins/{type}/index.zh.md`
Only flag this when the change is clearly release-oriented, version-oriented, or user-visible enough that a synchronized release update is expected.
### 2. README and Docs Mirror Consistency
When plugin README files change, check whether the mirrored docs pages were updated consistently.
Useful path mappings:
- `plugins/actions/{name}/README.md` -> `docs/plugins/actions/{name}.md`
- `plugins/actions/{name}/README_CN.md` -> `docs/plugins/actions/{name}.zh.md`
- `plugins/filters/{name}/README.md` -> `docs/plugins/filters/{name}.md`
- `plugins/filters/{name}/README_CN.md` -> `docs/plugins/filters/{name}.zh.md`
- `plugins/pipes/{name}/README.md` -> `docs/plugins/pipes/{name}.md`
- `plugins/pipes/{name}/README_CN.md` -> `docs/plugins/pipes/{name}.zh.md`
- `plugins/pipelines/{name}/README.md` -> `docs/plugins/pipelines/{name}.md`
- `plugins/pipelines/{name}/README_CN.md` -> `docs/plugins/pipelines/{name}.zh.md`
- `plugins/tools/{name}/README.md` -> `docs/plugins/tools/{name}.md`
- `plugins/tools/{name}/README_CN.md` -> `docs/plugins/tools/{name}.zh.md`
Do not over-report if the change is intentionally docs-only and not a release-prep change.
### 3. What's New and Release Notes Coverage
When a release-facing plugin update is present, check whether the release documentation covers the current scope clearly enough:
- the current `What's New` section reflects the latest release only
- the Chinese `最新更新` section is aligned with the English version
- `v{version}.md` and `v{version}_CN.md` exist when release notes are expected
- release notes cover meaningful feature, fix, docs, or migration changes in the current diff
Do not require release notes for tiny internal-only edits. Do flag missing release notes if the PR is obviously preparing a published plugin release.
### 4. Root Readme and Release-Facing Index Drift
For clearly release-oriented changes, check whether repository-level release-facing surfaces also need updates:
- root `README.md` updated date badge
- root `README_CN.md` updated date badge
- plugin index entries under `docs/plugins/**/index.md`
- plugin index entries under `docs/plugins/**/index.zh.md`
Only mention missing root-level updates when the PR is truly release-prep oriented, not for routine internal edits.
### 5. Maintainer Context and Release Clarity
Check whether the PR description or visible release-facing text is missing essential context:
- what is being released
- why the release matters
- whether migration or reconfiguration is needed
Only mention this if the omission makes release review materially harder.
## Severity Model
Use three levels only:
- `Blocking`: likely release regression, missing required version sync, or clearly incomplete release-facing update
- `Important`: should be fixed before merge to avoid release confusion or drift
- `Minor`: worthwhile release-facing cleanup or consistency suggestion
Do not invent issues just to leave a comment.
## Commenting Rules
Leave **one summary comment** only if there is actionable release-preflight feedback.
The comment must:
- be in English
- be concise and maintainer-like
- lead with findings, not compliments
- include clickable file references like ``plugins/pipes/foo/README.md`` or ``docs/plugins/pipes/index.md``
- avoid nested bullets
- avoid restating obvious diff content
Use this exact structure when commenting:
```markdown
## Release Preflight Review
### Blocking
- `path/to/file`: specific release-facing problem and why it matters
### Important
- `path/to/file`: missing sync or release-documentation gap
### Minor
- `path/to/file`: optional cleanup or consistency improvement
### Release Readiness
- Ready after the items above are addressed.
```
Rules:
- Omit empty sections.
- If there is only one severity category, include only that category plus `Release Readiness`.
- Keep the full comment under about 250 words unless multiple files are involved.
## No-Comment Rule
If the change has no meaningful release-preflight findings:
- do not leave a praise-only comment
- do not restate that checks passed
- call `noop` with a short explanation like:
```json
{"noop": {"message": "No action needed: reviewed the release-facing diff, version-sync expectations, and bilingual documentation coverage, and found no actionable preflight feedback."}}
```
## Suggested Review Process
1. Identify whether the change is actually release-oriented.
2. Inspect the changed files in the PR diff.
3. Read the repository release-prep rule files.
4. Check plugin version-sync expectations only where release intent is visible.
5. Check README, README_CN, docs mirrors, indexes, and release notes for drift.
6. Draft the shortest useful maintainer summary.
7. Leave exactly one `add_comment` or one `noop`.
## Important Constraints
- Do not force full release-prep expectations onto tiny internal edits.
- Do not require root README badge updates unless the PR is clearly release-facing.
- Do not ask for release notes if the change is not realistically a release-prep PR.
- Prefer repository-specific sync feedback over generic release advice.
- If you are unsure whether a release-facing sync file is required, downgrade to `Important` rather than `Blocking`.
- If a finding depends on inferred intent, state it conditionally instead of presenting it as certain.
## Final Requirement
You **must** finish with exactly one safe output action:
- `add_comment` if there is actionable feedback
- `noop` if there is not